Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« FYC: Kristen Wiig as Alexanya Atoz | Main | Box Office: Grandpa Debuts, Revenant Holds, Carol Falls »
Sunday
Jan242016

Podcast: Oscar's Diversity Initiative, PGA Win

NathanielKateyJoe and Nick, talk about this week's tumultuous Oscar season events and somehow Dolores Hart former actress/current nun, keeps popping up in conversation.

30 minutes 
00:01 PGA goes to The Big Short. Will SAG?
03:00 Hollywood & Racism
08:40 AMPAS new diversity plans
16:30 Oscar Stats, Prestige Math, and Future Oscar Races
22:20 12 Years a Slave (2013)
25:00 Who might lose their Oscar vote?

Related Reading For Context:
Academy press release Diversity initiative
PGA winners
Birth of a Nation (2016) at Sundance
Penelope Ann Miller's statement
• Mother Dolores Hart "From Hollywood to Holy Vows"

On the Next Podcast:
We all share our top ten lists! 

You can listen to the podcast here at the bottom of the post or download from iTunes soon

Diversity & Hollywood

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (13)

Candace Bergen was nominated in 1979, so she's okay.

January 24, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterArkaan

YES! Every year when mentions of Delores Hart resurface, my heart expands in glee! I want to see THAT ballot.

January 24, 2016 | Registered CommenterChris Feil

You all sound so fatigued - thanks for another podcast.
Kathleen Turner was nominated in 1987 - so she should be safe, but I would love to see her ballot.
I think she would be dead honest, but with a sassy bit of humour.
I love Steve Feinberg's series on "honest oscar voters", this year should be interesting.

January 24, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterLadyEdith

Great conversation. I wish the media (specifically the Hollywood Reporter) would take a cue from you/your panelists and actually explore systemic racism instead of framing this issue as "Are Academy voters racist?"

I hope Straight Outta Compton wins the SAG, if for no other reason than to see Jason Williams finally recognized for his brilliant work.

January 25, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterNewMoonSon

I keep thinking about Bridget Fonda. I'm not sure I need to see her ballot necessarily, but it's too bad she has to lose her membership privileges. Come back to movies, Bridget!

January 25, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterSuzanne

Jason Mitchell New Moon Son Mitchell.

January 25, 2016 | Unregistered Commenter/3rtful

Suzanne -- she can always exert influence on her husband's ballot!

January 25, 2016 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

Not to mention her dad, who's a lifetime member!

January 25, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterSuzanne

If you have been part of the film making process at any time in your life, you still understand and appreciate what goes into making a film, so I don't see why you shouldn't be able to vote on different aspects just because you haven't worked in a while. The Academy should just invite more diverse members every year.

January 25, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterRobMiles

@3rtful: Oops, thanks for catching that. That's what happens when you're posting at 6 a.m.!

January 25, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterNewMoonSon

Always good to listen to the team.
Re the Academy changes: It is yet to be seen how they define "active". Maybe a short film about a local issue would count, even if it just has an on-line release or is shown to other members? Some people can put a lot of effort into stretching the rules.
I hope it makes people question what screeners they choose to watch and which they put aside.

January 25, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterVaus

Nathaniel stated just what I was thinking: "it's a numbers game."

Not to lose folks in the math, but if there are, say, 25 films in the BP race and only three are focused on African-Americans, then mathematically, there's a 19.75% chance that none of the "African-American pictures" (for lack of a better term) wind up as nominees. And that's if there are ten nominees; it's even higher if there are fewer, as there have been for the past two years.

I say this only to support the idea that the solution will be to get more people considering more of these films as Best Picture contenders (and for that, we'll likely need Hollywood to make more of them).

January 25, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterEvan

Just to add: with 8 nominees, the probability of no African-American pictures jumps to 29.5%.

(I'm just guessing that approximately 25 films were in the BP race, however peripherally. I have no proof for this, obviously. And I am counting Straight Outta Compton, Creed, and Beasts of No Nation as "diverse" films that were in the conversation. These numbers are not science and are just meant to illustrate that when you start out with a dearth of diverse films in the conversation, the probability of #OscarsSoWhite happen really escalates. Of course, any bias on the part of Oscar voters would affect these results.)

January 26, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterEvan
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.