Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
DON'T MISS THIS

THE OSCAR VOLLEYS ~ ongoing! 

ACTRESS
ACTOR
SUPP' ACTRESS
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Happy Earth Day | Main | Happy Birthday, Jack Nicholson »
Friday
Apr222016

Shine On, Beautiful Murder

Team Experience is at the Tribeca Film Festival. Here's Jason on "A Kind of Murder" and "Always Shine"

I know it's blasphemy in these parts to speak ill of Mad Men (cue 90% of you automatically clicking away in disgust) but I could never really get into it because it felt too slavishly obsessed with 60s posturing - I love Mid-Century Design as much as the next Eero Saarinen disciple but I couldn't ever see the forest for the tulip chairs. That said, the new Patricia Highsmith adaptation A Kind of Murder (from the 1954 book The Blunderer, kind of a suburban copycat criss-cross of Strangers on a Train) makes Mad Men seem positively restrained in its period affectations - how you manage to turn a walking talking charm like Patrick Wilson into a walking talking turtleneck I'll never figure.

The turtlenecks! The martini glasses! The heavy salmon drapes and stone fireplaces! There were moments of such monumental airlessness, as if a plastic sofa cover was wrapped over every scene, where I felt it might be purposeful - where I thought of Todd Haynes' [safe] and the way that movie was built to make the audience hyperventilate while watching it... but A Kind of Murder is no [safe]. What it is is is an occasionally jazzy low-key thriller, with Eddie Marsan skulking about effectively making his case as our modern day Peter Lorre or Raymond Burr. But it ends up more of a put on, a face of perfectly applied make-up cast halfway in noirish shadow, than any sort of artful smear. Grade: C

Part of me wishes I had seen Mackenzie Davis and Caitlin FitzGerald in Sophia Takal's Always Shine before having seen Elisabeth Moss and Katherine Waterston in Alex Ross Perry's Queen of Earth last year, because while I'm more inclined towards Takal's smoky and sinister edged film... that's a whole lot of Persona riffing in the space of twelve months.

Always Shine tells the tale of two actresses in one of those friendships so fraught with complications it would have doctors reaching for the defibrillation paddles - the pendulums of success and resentment, professional jealousy and personal affection, flinging through space so close that something's bound to rub off and muck up everything. 

And inevitably, muck. In this case the the muck under the misty cliff-faces and mossy canyons of Big Sur, California, an L.A. getaway close enough that when the sun sets the shadows from the Hollywood sign are yet still the first harbingers of nightfall. Here these ladies make their escape, a weekend coffee klatsch under the guise of nursing emotional distance, their carry-on's stacked with comedy and tragedy masks, plus sundresses. Inevitably, tragically, the two women end up flashing their SAG cards in each other's faces instead of laying bare their hearts, a battle of wiles not wills.

You know, actresses. And who doesn't love a movie about actresses? I think I'm preaching to the choir here. The performative commingling of these two still fresh talents is a blast - Davis I've already fallen head over for on Halt and Catch Fire (please tell me you're all watching that show) and FitzGerald is always fine despite a frustratingly written role on Masters of Sex; here these two fold into and under each other in smart - and, in this movie's true blessing, in unexpectedly funny - ways. Grade: B+

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

I know it's blasphemy in these parts to speak ill of Mad Men

Boo! Boo! *throws tomatoes*

April 22, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterSean C.

JA: Same. I watched more than two seasons of it and my end thought was: "Huh? THIS won four Emmys for Best Drama Series?" I'd hand it acting prizes for Hamm and Hendricks for a season or two, but of the nominees for all of it's seasons, I'd probably go with these for overall cohesive SHOWS:

07-08: Dexter S2
08-09: Damages S2
09-10: Breaking Bad S3
10-11: Friday Night Lights S5
11-12: Breaking Bad S4
12-13: Game of Thrones S3 (That Breaking Bad won for S5-A and S5-B, it's weakest moments, is insane. It didn't devolve into a bad show or anything, but it peaked in S2 and S4.)
13-14: True Detective S1
14-15: Orange is the New Black S2
Reasonable hope for the 15-16 Emmys? Jessica Jones taking it in, pretty much, a walk as Netflix's first win. (House of Cards was always calcified ballot filler and I don't really see the Emmys giving something as relatively featherweight as Orange the win. Homeland's already won, Downton would have won over Breaking Bad S5-B if the passion was genuinely there, the Game of Thrones rape controversy probably leaves a second win off the table and Better Call Saul might be an exceptionally done direct prequel, but it's still a direct prequel, which means character arcs are locked in from the outset and tension is low.)

April 22, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

JA: Should read 3 and 4, but you get the basic point, right?

April 22, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

the Game of Thrones rape controversy probably leaves a second win off the table

Why, since it didn't stop them from winning the first time?

April 22, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterSean C.

Sean C.: It's not impossible (even with that controversy, it, sadly, still doesn't seem AS hindered as Saul, Homeland, Downton or House of Cards), but that controversy could easily play in more now and Netflix getting a win would make sense at this point.

April 22, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

I agree. Mad Men's strength was its acting and wonderful ensemble NOT the show itself.
It another situation of people not realizing Great Acting does not equal Great Movie/Show.

April 22, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterAnonny

If Netflix is going to win anything, it's for House of Cards, but least of all not Jessica Jones.

April 28, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterCraver
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.