Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
DON'T MISS THIS

THE OSCAR VOLLEYS ~ ongoing! 

ACTRESS
ACTOR
SUPP' ACTRESS
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« 47 days til Oscar nominations and I'm feeling a bit morbid... | Main | A First Trailer for Haigh's "Lean on Pete" »
Thursday
Dec072017

FYC: Christine Baranski in "A Bad Moms Christmas" 

By Spencer Coile 

As this year's Oscar race heats up, two performances appear to be our Supporting Actress frontrunners: Allison Janney in I, Tonya and Laurie Metcalf in Lady Bird. These two veterans share more in common than scene-stealing roles in their respective films. They are each renowned television actresses (with 13 Emmy nominations and 10 wins between the two of them). With careers spanning decades and their biggest success arguably coming from TV, there is something deeply satisfying about seeing these two respected television actresses be paid their dues for film as well.

That said, there is another 2017 performance in the same vein that merits some discussion: Christine Baranski in A Bad Moms Christmas... 

When Amy (Mila Kunis) receives a text that her mother is coming to town for Christmas, she is instantly filled with dread. Her mother, Amy laments, was hyper-critical of everything she did. While her rants initially feel like an exaggeration, we soon see the real-life nightmare when Ruth (Baranski) shows up at Amy's door. Storming inside, Ruth immediately begins nit-picking her daugher's home, lack of Christmas decorations, and her boyfriend -- who she mistakes as a servant and asks to take her bags upstairs. 

Baranski, no stranger to playing controlling matriarchs, seems to be having the time of her life playing Ruth. What could have easily been just a scenery-chewing lark for any character actress soon turns into a sympathethic characterization of motherhood  -- that's entirely thanks to Baranski's skillful work. She has an uncanny abillity to pull focus from any actor onscreen by a simple raise of her eyebrow or the tinest twitch of her mouth. While everyone around her is acting larger than life, she displays a steely and often subtle reserve that is equal parts menacing and funny. Even when her character indulges in the film's childish antics, like a slow motion dodgeball battle with her daughter, you simply cannot take your eyes off of her. 

Ruth really is a monster. She undermines Amy's wish for a quiet Christmas and lavishly decorates her house. She forces her family to participate in a caroling contest (complete with Amy in a Scrooge outfit). She relishes in A depressing five-hour rendition of The Nutcracker. And, in the film's climax, she throws an extravagant party at her daughter's house -- leading to a battle between the two where they smash Christmas ornaments and the ice sculpture Ruth had made. This scene not only offers some physical comedy from Baranski, but also one of the funniest line deliveries of 2017:

Those ornaments are from the Titanic! That ice is from the moon! That was moon ice, you nasty bitch!

But as we slowly start to learn, she has her reasons for being guarded and villainous. The screenplay's obvious effort to make Ruth likeable by the end, mostly works because Baranski can clearly sell anything that's asked of her. Her reconciliation scene with Kunis is actually charming and believeable, which more than anything, is a testament to Baranski's skill. 

A Bad Moms Christmas is sometimes a chore to get through. It uses the formula that made its predecessor successful to only minimal effect. Not to mention having Susan Sarandon in anything in 2017 is groan-worthy. But many of the actors are game for the childish antics of this sequel, and none moreso than Christine Baranski.

Though she is not actually (and never would be) a viable Supporting Actress contender for this film, it is my deepest hope that Baranski gets a project worthy of her talent soon. That way, she too, could follow the Janney/Metcalfe trajectory from talented TV veteran to Oscar contender glory. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

SO THANKFUL FOR THIS.
She is legendary in Bad Moms Christmas. When she plans to sing the kids "My Heart Will Go On" as a lullaby, I had never felt more seen.

December 7, 2017 | Unregistered Commenterchasm301

Amazing. Could not agree more.

December 7, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterT-Bone

Thank you Spencer - please may everybody's FYC articles be as compelling (and for off-the-track choices) as this one.

I'll now be watching this on Netflix at some point next year (despite having no prior interest and not having seen the original)...

December 8, 2017 | Unregistered Commenterkermit_the_frog

Baranski is a genius actress and i only saw Bad Moms 2 because she was in it. She could have been great in it with good material but the screenplay is pure garbage and her character arc is silly and not believable at all so ... she does what she can. But the end result is truly frustrating, especially in a year where Janney and Metcalf get juicy parts on the big screen!

December 8, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterClement_Paris

YES TIMES INFINITY
She should have won all the awards for Diane in TGW
Here for her big screen glory!

December 8, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterCraver
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.