Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team.

This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms. 

Powered by Squarespace
DON'T MISS THIS

Follow TFE on Substackd 

COMMENTS

Oscar Takeaways
12 thoughts from the big night

 

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Moulin Rouge!'s Stage Life Begins | Main | ‘The English Patient’ Wins Best of Man Booker Prize »
Tuesday
Jul102018

Doc Corner: Kimberly Reed Returns with 'Dark Money'

by Glenn Dunks

Talk about a sharp turn. Director Kimberly Reed is best known for her 2008 feature Prodigal Sons, an autobiographical documentary about Reed’s journey as a transgender woman returning home to her small town high school reunion where she not only must confront the people who knew her as a football quarterback when living as a male, but also the strange story of her adopted brother’s newly discovered heritage to Orson Welles and Rita Hayworth and his declining mental health. It was an astonishing film and one that The Film Experience loved and covered at the time.

In the time since, Reed brought her story to audiences once more in the opera As One (which I also covered in 2014) as well as produced Paul Goodman Changed My Life and last year’s The Death and Life of Marsha P. Johnson for Netflix. It was a great surprise to me then to discover Reed’s latest film – her first as director for a decade – was a swerve away from themes of identity, gender, sexuality and family, but was instead a piece of investigative political journalism imbued with the narrative thrust of a court-room thriller.

Dark Money examines the various threads that make up the confusing and alarming world of American election campaign financing...

The film goes to great lengths through music and editing to portray the sinister forces at work that give the film its name, an elaborate series of misdirects and ruses that buttress the US political system to the point of illegality, yet do so under the guise of anonymity. The way organisations and companies filter their money through the system of PACs and Super PACs (basically a white collar form of money laundering) who then target ill-preferred political candidates with incorrect and often outright slanderous attack campaigns to get specific individuals elected only to then hold them to ransom so to speak for support of the original corporation’s political and social agendas. It’s scary, but hardly shocking.

Reed focuses primarily on her home state of Montana, examining in fine detail the state’s descent into political muckraking that goes back to the 1800s when copper mining companies bought the state’s leaders for their benefit, and their efforts to clean it up that have now been unravelled by the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision. Beyond the specific histories, Reed follows John S. Adams, a newspaper reporter on the trail of just how threatened democracy is by these American oligarchs who are financing these campaigning schemes and in particularly in the case of Art Wittich, a member of the Montana legislature taken to court over his accepting of illegal campaign funds.

Reed’s film is a really striking one. What could have been a mere segue in another film – think of the likes of Inside Job or the more recent The China Hustle – is instead given the attention it deserves and is handled delicately. It is clear and concise, miraculously (and frighteningly) easy to follow as it weaves across the country and through decades of political discourse. Reed and her editor Jay Arthur Sterrenberg share a writing credit and their efforts at assembling the film are not easily ignored. Likewise, I was impressed by Reed, Sterrenberg and their co-cinematographer Eric Phillips-Horst for the way they were able to always find interesting compositions and frames for the drama, even when it’s the simplest of shots like that of the red blinking traffic lights in the foreground with the White House just out of focus at the back.

Perhaps by pure necessity of her home state’s political leaning, Dark Money is a thoroughly bi-partisan film. Many of the individuals targeted for smear campaigns are Republicans (presumably because the insidious corporations wielding their influence know Democrat candidates won’t win) who are perceived as too moderate for the policies they wish to see introduced or stripped away. Despite the film not falling across overtly red or blue lines, it of course speaks to a larger relevancy as the "swamp" widens across the country.

While the subject matter may be wildly different to her previous work, it’s obvious that the through-line between Reed’s two directorial efforts is a real empathy for the sort of people she grew up around. So while Dark Money is often horrifying in the realities it is laying down, there is a genuine sadness to be felt that this was one of the first dominoes to fall that lead America to where it is now. And no matter the political lines you fall across, that should be a tragedy.

Release: Opens this Friday at NYC's IFC Center, followed by Washington D.C. on July 20, and more cities from July 27 through August. It will later screen on PBS on October 1st as a part of their POV series.

Oscar Chances: Without the grandeur of Inside Job or the specificity and name recognition in Abacus, these sort of political features tend to get lost in the awards fray. Having said that, given the ongoing political crises and the election coming up later in 2018, its story could prove timely and push it to bigger attention.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (8)

It's a shame "Dark Money" by Jane Mayer isn't required reading in high schools and universities across the U.S. (Jane Mayer is a New Yorker columnist whose work is terrific)
This documentary is clearly based on Mayer's research, and looks at the "swamp" of campaign money and it's pernicious influence. Perhaps the worst part is that this isn't fictional, it's all too real and nauseating.
I suppose this topic is too depressing for most people, which is a shame. (no comments so far)
The "Gore vs. Bush" decision to stop a recount of a democratic vote was the first step towards authoritarianism in the U.S. But the "Citizens United" decision marks the real nail in the coffin in terms of warping the system in favour of the rich. The U.S. took a very different turn from other Western democracies in terms of doing away with limits on campaign financing. I shudder at the result.
As a Canadian, I'm grateful we did not take this road, I can only hope that Americans do take the time to watch this documentary and go out and vote.
I only hope that free and fair elections will return to the United States in the future. Right now they do not exist.

July 10, 2018 | Unregistered CommenterLadyEdith

I will go to see this, no matter how depressing/infuriating it promises to be. Basically, I imagine it will confirm all my worst fears - that the USA is slowly being dismantled, on piece of democracy at a time. And with a large portion of the population not caring, not knowing, or actively colluding in our downfall (including many of our politicians, of course).

July 10, 2018 | Unregistered CommenterRob

I completely agree with LadyEdith - Dark Money by Jane Mayer is one of the best books I have read in recent years (as a side note, Strange Justice by Jane Mayer and Jill Abrahamson, about the Clarence Thomas hearings, is one of the best books I've read, ever, though most people won't have the stomach to read it right now). I am from Wisconsin - known for clean government until the Koch brothers basically bought themselves a governor who tried to dismantle everything the state stood for. I hope this movie plays in theaters here, as there definitely will be interest.

July 10, 2018 | Unregistered CommenterSuzanne

Thank you Suzanne & Rob, it's a depressing and frightening time. Citizens in the U.S. can still turn the tide in the mid-terms but it will take a huge turnout and some hustle. Don't lose heart.

July 10, 2018 | Unregistered CommenterLadyEdith

Suzanne, Wisconsin does also get a look in the movie.

July 10, 2018 | Unregistered CommenterGlenn Dunks

I am the person who found and exposed the documents that made this documentary possible and Im so disappointed that the story of how they came about was scrubbed from the record..along with even my name. Shame on kimberly reed . she never even tried to contact me. I reverse engineered that scam, I identified the players, I did the right thing and there is NO WAY everyone of them didnt know it. I was INTENTIONALLY left out. Goole my name. Read " daylighting dark money" an article wrote years before her movie premiered. I was made out to seem like a crack head and my political agenda ignored. SMH

April 17, 2021 | Unregistered CommenterMark Seibel

Friends, I won’t hide it: I adore money! And when it comes to investments, I always look for the best options. Cryptocurrency is exactly what suits me. After all, it promises not only earnings, but also the opportunity to diversify your portfolio. I am convinced that the future lies in crypto, and I am ready to invest in this promising market. Who else shares my point of view? Let's discuss!

February 22, 2024 | Registered CommenterPeter Sullivan

I can tell you that monitoring and rebalancing are important aspects of crypto portfolio management. This will help you effectively monitor your cryptocurrency investments, as well as recommendations on when and how to rebalance your portfolio. I also advise you to visit site to learn more about the best multi-blockchain wallet.

February 22, 2024 | Registered CommenterJoseph Parsons
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.