Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team.

This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms. 

Powered by Squarespace
DON'T MISS THIS

Follow TFE on Substackd 

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Curio: Michelle Pfeiffer in Vogue, 1991 | Main | Monday Monologue: You Spoiled Little Bastard. »
Tuesday
Apr052011

Box Office: The Source of that Insidious Hopping

Fact #1: I love Easter, bunnies, Easter bunnies, chocolate bunnies, coloring eggs.
Fact #2: Seeing Hop would ruin the upcoming holiday entirely for me because nothing makes me gag harder than animated CGI characters doing hip anachronistic things like oh, I don't know dreaming of playing in a rock n roll band. Just typing this out gave me salmonella. Mainstream moviegoers felt otherwise throwing their hardearned cash at the British wabbit. It had the best opening weekend since Rango. Where were these crowds when The Rock was doing Tooth Fairy?

01. HOP $37.5 new
02. SOURCE CODE $14.8 new
03. INSIDIOUS $13.2 new
04. DIARY OF A WIMPY KID: RODRICK RULES $10.0 (cumulative: $38.1)
05. LIMITLESS $9.3 (cumulative: $55.5)

Poor Patrick. Things never end well for him at the movies.

Hop's success frightens me and the only possible joy that can come from it is that maybe someone will give James Marsden another plum comic gig like the one in Enchanted.  I would however totally want to see this week's chart topper if it were about Jake Gyllenhaal and the Easter Bunny ibeing thrust back in time repeatedly until they saved Patrick Wilson from demonic possessions in The Source of That Insidious Hopping. Don't you wish you could sometimes watch three movies at once?

Per Screen Average Which movies were you most likely to find crowds at? I've eliminated all the specialty IMAX stuff and everything that's only at one theater because "come on" and here's what'cha got.

01. HOP $10,000ish
02. IN A BETTER WORLD $8,000ish (The Danish Oscar winner is finally on a few screens. Weird to wait an entire month post Oscar win to debut.)
03. WIN WIN $7,000ish (cumulative $1.9 million. Big jump in screen count this past weekend. I almost went today but my friend shifted plans.)
04. JANE EYRE $6,700ish  (cumulative $3.4 million. Still going strong. Yay)
05. INSIDIOUS $5,500ish (and this type of movie is always better with a crowd)

What did you see over the weekend? I was entertaining so I didn't get out. Although we did watch the SXSW winner Weekend which was fairly strong as indies go. It definitely knew what it wanted to be and didn't get distracted at being that and that's always a huge plus.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (11)

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE CROWDS WERE DOING!!!

IF YA SMELLLLALALALALAL WHAT THE ROCK . . . IS COOKIN

April 5, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterray

Lmao. It's funny that he's starting to go back to wrestling now. I guess he realized that his movie career is kind of tanking, which is too bad because he could be a pretty good actor (being the Tooth Fairy didn't help matters, though).

Anyway, I saw Source Code on Friday. It was a pretty solid film. It doesn't have great depth but it does work on a emotional level and the science of the film makes sense. The only bad thing about the film was Jeffrey Wright's overacting. It felt like he was in a completely different film! I'll say this, though: I found it more enjoyable than Moon.

I respect Moon for what Duncan accomplished with such a small budget - as well as for Rockwell's strong acting work - but as a film, I just didn't find it all that interesting.

April 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterDaniel Armour

@Daniel A: I completely agree with you regarding "Source Code" on all fronts. What was Jeffrey Wright doing? That said, I thoroughly endorse Jake G. as a leading man, as he is always so consistent.

April 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterTroy H

I went to see Source Code. For me it was a bit disappointing because I knew at once who the terrorist was and i did not particularly liked the premise on which the movie rested (accessing someone's conscience once he/she has died). But it has very strong acting (specially for me Vera Farmiga).

April 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterPedro

I went to go see 'Win Win', I enjoyed it. It was a nice, gentle movie. Very humane view of all the characters - and a great supporting cast (Bobby Canavale, Jeffrey Tambor, Burt Young, Melanie Lynskey).

April 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRebecca

Saw Source Code. For me it's the first movie to fully appreciate and exploit Gylenhaal's skills as a leading man (which are very specific and, for me, limited) since Zodiac. The rest of the cast is good too. Agreed with the above comments about Wright, though he reminded me a little of Walter Bishop from Fringe, and squinting my eyes so I saw John Noble rather than Jeffrey Wright got me through those scenes ok.

Looking back over this year's films so far, I'm really happy to see the B-level studio-ish entertainment thriving thus far - from The Mechanic and Unknown to The Lincoln Lawyer, Limitless, and now Source Code. These are the kind of unpretentious mid-level thrillers that have been a dying breed over the last few years. Very happy to see them making a comeback (not that the comeback started this year, but it seems like these movies are starting to rev back up as commercial prospects, whereas a few years ago most of these movies would've been first weekend flops).

April 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRoark

I saw Insidious and Sucker Punch over the weekend. Insidious was a fun experience because I was in a crowded, screaming theater. Sucker Punch (a movie I was dragged to) made me realize that I still hate Zack Snyder.

April 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterJoey

I saw Insidious in a crowded theater as well, and that's the only way to enjoy such a movie. Definitely a crowd experience. I absolutely loved it--to think it was produced for such a small budget is astonishing. It gave me faith in the horror genre again.

April 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterKevin

I saw Source Code and actually found it a really intriguing and satisfying sci-fi film. Jones really excelled in making the time travels fresh and emotionally resonant. Jake and Michelle Monaghan were great and had terrific chemistry and Vera Farmiga was as usual immensely compelling and completely natural on screen. I do agree that Jeffrey Wright was so over the top. It's like the filmmakers took his unused footage from the cutting room floor of The Invasion and stuck it in this film. Tres bizarre.

April 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterAaron

Screen Size 12.1 Inch
Resolution Pixels 1280x800
Backlight Type 1 CCFL
Aspect Ratio 16:9
Screen Surface Glossy
Data Connection 20-Pin
Application Laptop or Notebook
http://www.nbkit.com/Wholesale/product/New-AUO-B121EW01-V.3-LCD-screen-12.1-inch-1CCFL-1280x800-WXGA_c17775.html
AUO B121EW01 V.3 LCD screen LCD screen is the most important component of laptop.Maybe Other laptop parts or components could be replaced or repaired easily at low cost.but for LCD screen,in most cases it only can't be compatible problem. For solve the following problem,broken lcd screen,bad pixels,white lines,color,shine screen.Replace A LCD screen is only solution.Sometime,you need to make sure anti-static steps prepared before remove old screens and check new lcd screen parameters match your original LCD screen. so sugguest buyers need buy it at professional laptop screen website.
The LCD screen review from NBkit.com
12.1" LCD Screen has been experienced great changes from year 2005 to now. XGA--SXGA+--WXGA--WXGA HD, 5 Kinds different resolution, 5 kinds diffent data connector, plus backlight and slim or not, really rich in changes. Honesly every DIY buyer should note this before any replace screen action. Nbkit.com do a leading steps , and list their LCD screen connector type ,pins quantity to make sure every buyer get a useful support. Let"s see the tables, size backlight pins resolution Thickness 12.1" 1 CCFL 20 1280x768 WXGA standard 12.1" 1 CCFL 20 1024x768 XGA standard 12.1" 1 CCFL 30 1024x768 XGA standard 12.1" LED 30small 1024x768 XGA Slim 12.1" 1 CCFL 20 1280x800 WXGA standard 12.1" LED 30small 1280x800 WXGA Slim 12.1" LED 40 1280x800 WXGA Slim 12.1" LED 40small 1280x800 WXGA Slim 12.1" LED 20 1280x800 WXGA standard 12.1" LED 30 1280x800 WXGA standard 12.1" LED 30small 1280x800 WXGA standard 12.1" LED 40 1280x800 WXGA standard 12.1" LED 40small 1280x800 WXGA standard 12.1" 1 CCFL 20 1400x1050 SXGA+ standard 12.1" 1 CCFL 30 1400x1050SXGA+ standard 12.1" LED 40small 1440x900 WXGA+ standard 12.1" LED 30 1366x768 WXGA HD standard 12.1" LED 40 1366x768 WXGA HD standard

April 6, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterHoney

not a movie , but we watched the HBO mini :MIldred Pierce" what a dreadful adaptation ... the acting, writing are less than average. Winslet is totally miscast and cannot keep her accent quite right ( why did they not use an American actress ) that's what they are saying about Streep doing Thatcher!!!! Melissa Leo is reading her lines ... the little girl playing Veda is Horrific ... Rachel Evan Wood has not entered into the series yet... hope she is better at playing Veda that the 12 year old.

Also, there was no need to drag this movie on for 5 hours... the 3 parts dragged.

April 6, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterrick
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.