Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« 1965: The Swinging Sixties are in, and “Beach Party” films are on their way out | Main | New Oscar Predictions: Best Actor »
Thursday
Oct082020

How had I never seen... "Doctor Zhivago"?  

Every once in a while we ask Team Experience members to finally get around to a famous film they've been meaning to watch forever. Here's Christopher James...

I hate to say it, but when does one put on a three hour epic? The time never quite seems right, especially in a pre-quarantine world. That’s why David Lean’s epic extravaganzas had long been blind spots in my filmography. Both The Bridge on the River Kwai and Lawrence of Arabia become instant personal favorites after finally watching them for the first time in the past five years. Yet, somehow Doctor Zhivago (1965) always seemed just a bridge, or perilous train ride, too far. When I would think of it, I would picture the sets and costumes from stills. But was it worth sitting through over three hours of a movie just for, in the words of Aretha Franklin, “gowns, beautiful gowns”? Luckily, the epic is way more than just its trappings. As Team Experience gushed a few years back, there are so many memorable scenes and subplots in this involving romantic quartet.

To compliment Doctor Zhivago appropriately, one must go down each Oscar craft category one by one. It’s a technically stunning achievement that is beautiful, towering and simultaneously warm and cold all in the same breath...

Nothing can compare to the widescreen majesty of Freddie Young’s work as cinematographer on Lawrence of Arabia  but his work here is much different. While that film saw beauty in sparse vistas, Doctor Zhivago loves to crowd its frame with details. Sweeping shots of the streets of Moscow bring to life the palpable energy of revolution in the first act. Through train escapes and brutal treks through the snow, Young finds beauty and grandeur in danger.

Daniel Walber already brilliantly described Doctor Zhivago’s Oscar winning production design with great eloquence and detail for his series “The Furniture.” My appreciation only grew upon reading it. Perhaps the most indelible craft of the film is Phyllis Dalton’s costume design.

 

 

Everything Julie Christie wears epitomizes the cross between high fashion and winter function. It’s no wonder both costume design categories went to women who dressed Julie Christie (Julie Harris won Best Costume Design - Black and White for Darling). Christie is an incredible model for both the sleek dresses of the Russian nightlife and the puffy hats and knitwears of the freezing cold. How many women during this time period dressed the way Lara is depicted in the movie? Probably not many. However, it was worth it for the cultural imprint left by Dalton’s modern take on the past.

 Enough about the clothes, let’s get to the plot.


It’s remarkable how much time the film spends setting up Yuri and Lara’s lives before the two fall madly and passionately in love with each other. Yuri reunites with his childhood friend Tonya (Geraldine Chaplin) and winds up in a stilted marriage with her. Meanwhile, 17-year-old Lara juggles a toxic affair with her mother’s friend Victor Komarovsky (Rod Steiger) and a potential engagement from the young revolutionary, Pascha (Tom Courtenay).

Which of those two stories sounds more dramatic? If you answered Lara, you’re correct. Christie carries the film in this first hour the way only a true movie star can. As the sole acting nominee, Courtenay expertly dramatizes the sacrifices one has to make when revolution is their main goal. Rod Steiger chews the scenery to bits, but makes for a great villain one can’t look away from. Still, Lean can’t resist spending copious amounts of time setting up the seeds of Revolution and introducing World War I. The grandiose set-up gets more oxygen than the two magnanimous leads.

Act Two delivers on the grand, sweeping romance that comes with the Doctor Zhivago namesake. Omar Sharif and Julie Christie are quite possibly the most attractive two people in Hollywood (and that’s before you add on the incredible costumes). Flames instantly ignite when these two gorgeous actors shoot each other a passionate glance. The section in the abandoned Variykino manor is far and away the highlight of the film. The ice over the interiors of this palace only makes the estate look more regal and magical. The same could be said of Omar Sharif earlier in the second act, as Yuri trudges through freezing cold conditions to Yuriatin, where Lara awaits. Yuri and Lara’s seismic love is only eclipsed by the cataclysmic forces that tear them apart. That’s what makes this section such a compelling romance and devastating melodrama.

 After first viewing, Doctor Zhivago is a movie I like and respect a great deal. Yet, I can’t say that I love it. There are few people who have ever been more beautiful than Omar Sharif and Julie Christie. Their chemistry suggests a passionate romance torn asunder by fate, war and revolution. Yet, for all the groundwork act one lays, it focuses too much on what keeps these two alluring people apart rather than why they should be together. Doctor Zhivago is gorgeous in every way and a monument to the epics of the 50s and 60s. However, I’d likely sooner take the optimism of The Sound of Music, the magnitude of Lawrence of Arabia or even the bonkers audacity of Sergei Bondarchuk’s War and Peace. On the other hand, perhaps a movie as grand as Doctor Zhivago takes more than one watch to fully appreciate.

more on 1965
more from Christopher James



 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (10)

I have never revisited this movie since I saw it when to opened in 1965? and it left me

"cold".

October 8, 2020 | Unregistered Commenterrdf

I LOVE Julie Christie but I’ve never seen this. I think it’s the runtime that had me stay away but I guess since I never the house anymore now would be the perfect time to watch.

October 8, 2020 | Unregistered CommenterBradley

I watched this as a teenager when I was trying to complete the AFI 100 list, and never thought of revisiting it after it became the highest ranked movie to fall off the updated list. Maybe I should revisit it sometime.

October 8, 2020 | Unregistered Commenterajnrules

I do like this film a lot. I love the art direction and that brief appearance from Klaus Kinski.

October 8, 2020 | Unregistered Commenterthevoid99

Love the look in one of the pics as the lady behinds face witnesses Julie's total film star glamour.

October 8, 2020 | Unregistered Commentermarkgordonuk

The failure of AMPAS to properly recognize Omar Sharif puzzles me.

He lost his supporting Oscar for Lawrence of Arabia to an aging character actor in a poorly adapted Tennessee Williams play.

Oscar voters snubbed Sharif for Doctor Zhivago and nominated a cringe worthy performance of Laurence Olivier in Othello. Olivier was in full black face amidst the Civil Rights movement. Yet, Sharif, a man of color in one of the year’s finest films is ignored.

October 8, 2020 | Unregistered CommenterJames

Nice analysis of something that was so seminal when it was released but doesn't seem to have the staying power of other films released in the same time frame.

Julie Christie is my favorite living actress but I can't say I loved this film. It is grandiose and epic but for a good deal of its run time I found it a slog. Julie and Omar are captivating and gorgeous as are the set, costumes and the Ice Palace but it seemed to have a great deal of filler.

However it has been years since I watched it from beginning to end and it may be one of those films, like Julie's Far from the Madding Crowd, that lends itself to deeper discoveries with repeat viewings.

October 8, 2020 | Unregistered Commenterjoel6

Wow, I read this write-up early this morning and expected hosannas so I didn't bother to write.

Dr. Zhivago is a stone cold masterpiece people. I guess you need to watch it on the absolute biggest screen possible with the best sound and no interruptions. Isn't this still the biggest boxoffice romance ever committed to screen, barring perhaps Titanic which is at least as much about the disaster?

I saw this as a teenager in 1975 at the biggest screen in Sacramento for 75 cents at the Saturday matinee. I scrounged through the sofa cushions to find another three quarters so I could watch it again the following Saturday.

October 8, 2020 | Unregistered CommenterDave in Hollywood

@Dave in Hollywood

Depends on whether or not you classify Gone with the Wind as a "romance". To me it's sort of a "woman's film"

Adjusted for inflation box-office wise Gone with the Wind tops the list, Titanic is no. 5, Doctor Zhivago is ranked no. 8

October 11, 2020 | Unregistered CommenterJezza

I loved Doctor Zhivago when I was a teen full of hormones and Omar Sharif was a heartthrob. And I thought Julie Christie was wonderful. I'm not sure but I think perhaps the movie was shown in New Orleans in Cinerama (if there's even anyone else that remembers that). I remember the shock of Omar's character being in love with Someone He Wasn't Married To (I grew up Catholic).

I had the pleasure of re-watching Zhivago a few years back, and it was wonderful all over again.

October 25, 2020 | Unregistered Commenterrrrich7
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.