Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
COMMENTS

 

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Calendar-Man v. Film Culture: The Bubble-Bursting Wars | Main | Set Photos of Punk-Rock Meryl Streep »
Thursday
Oct302014

The Honoraries: Harry Belafonte in Carmen Jones (1954)

Welcome to "The Honoraries". We're celebrating the careers of the Honorary Oscar recipients of 2014 and the Jean Hersholt winner (Harry Belafonte). Here's longtime TFE reader and new contributor Teo Bugbee, whose work you might have read at The Daily Beast, on Belafonte's biggest film...

Even in the fantastic canon of classic Hollywood musicals, Carmen Jones is a standout. It’s got all the colors—Deluxe, not Technicolor, which as any John Waters fan will tell you is the real deal—it’s got the timeless score by Georges Bizet, but before we talk about the film itself, let’s take a minute to look at the backstory, if only because what was going on behind the scenes in Carmen Jones is at least as interesting as what made it on film. 

Though he never really made particularly political films, director Otto Preminger was a modern man when it came to his politics, and he proposed the idea of adapting the Broadway smash Carmen Jones into a film as a means of showing off the black talent that he felt Hollywood was excluding. But despite Preminger’s substantial box office clout, no major studio wanted to take on a film with an all black cast. So Preminger took Carmen Jones to United Artists and set out making it basically as an independent film.

Harry Belafonte was brought on immediately as Joe, but Preminger took a longer time to find his star, testing a number of black actresses. 

Lusty affairs and a singular film after the jump...

 (Most excellently, Carmen was initially offered to Eartha Kitt, but because Eartha Kitt was a bad bitch she turned it down when she heard that her singing voice would be dubbed.) 

When Preminger finally did settle on a star, he went with the Dorothy Dandridge, and much to the surprise of all involved, the two began a torrid affair on set that would last for several years. It ended poorly, and Dandridge would later say Preminger’s bad advice ruined her career, but damn if whatever they had going on in Carmen Jones wasn’t working. 

Like Bergman with Ullman, Fellini with Masina, in the sights of Preminger’s camera, Dandridge is radiant, and the camera trails her Carmen Jones at least as hungrily as Belafonte’s Joe does. Carmen Jones is a lustful film, and the frankness it displayed around sex and desire, especially with regards to black actors, was unheard of. It was banned in several states, and Preminger fought censorship from script to screen, and finally in the courts as he overturned the state censors in Kansas and Maryland in one of the first big blows to Hollywood’s production code. 

But even knowing that, even now, the lustfulness of Carmen Jones comes as a surprise. It’s hard to remember the last time a pair of black actors got to make love on screen the way that Dandridge and Belafonte do, looking the way that Dandridge and Belafonte do. They are sexy, glamorous, and because Preminger favored long takes with such a wide shot scale, we have a chance to see them actually interact with each other in the same shot. They kiss, they touch, they’re physically intertwined as much as they ever are emotionally intertwined. 

Carmen Jones was Preminger’s first musical, and frankly, at times the fit is a bit awkward. He favored an objective look at the world, and he liked to let his camera linger and wander, which means that sometimes the transitions into and out of songs are a bit abrupt, and the numbers rarely take hold the way they do in the hands of musical masters like Minnelli or Donen. 

But looking at Dandridge and Belafonte, looking at the cast of entirely black faces, down to even the last extra, it’s hard to hold the occasional awkward moment against Preminger. The emotion in the film builds honestly and by the time the film reaches its tragic close, I always find myself a little stunned.  

That’s it? There’s no more? Harry Belafonte didn’t go on to become the next Paul Newman, and Dorothy Dandridge didn’t follow in Ava Gardner’s footsteps? Why not??

And then of course I remember what industry I’m talking about. And I get grateful all over again for this film. When Oscar recognizes Harry Belafonte  soon, it’s not just his humanitarian work they're honoring but the film he made, and all of the ones that he didn’t make. The ones Dorothy Dandridge didn’t make. The ones Eartha Kitt didn’t. And Sidney Poitier and Paul Robeson and Hattie McDaniel and Ruby Dee. 

Carmen Jones might not have been able to open the gates for black American cinema, but it’s a window into that world that might have been. For that, and all other reasons, I’ll always love it.


Previously on The Honoraries:
Maureen O'Hara in The Parent Trap (1961)
Maureen O'Hara in Black Swan (1942)

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (8)

Beautiful piece. I know that Dandridge's name got quite a surge in awareness for contemporary audiences with that Halle Berry telefilm some years ago but looking at these pictures i'm reminded yet again how famous Harry Belafonte was as a singer and how much more famous he should've been as an actor. So ridiculously good looking!

October 30, 2014 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

Very entertaining read. I wanted so to love this movie but ended up only liking it. The fault I think lies in Preminger's prosaic, sometimes lumbering direction which rendered some of the scenes inert.

I've also never been a huge fan of Belafonte, I don't dislike him but I don't find him captivating either. Someone I did find captivating however is Dorothy Dandridge. She is the biggest reason to see the film, though Pearl Bailey is terrific as Frankie. I understand why Dorothy had to be dubbed since hers wasn't an operatic voice but it was a shame since she had a fine voice of her own.

I recently saw a minor June Allyson/Angela Lansbury film called Remains To Be Seen and in one scene set in a nightclub up popped Dorothy as herself, dressed to the nines she performed a sensational number. It was by far the most memorable thing about the picture.

October 30, 2014 | Unregistered Commenterjoel6

I love this - and this Honoraries series is such a great way to get into conversation about the honorary oscar winners. I look forward to seeing this feature annually.
The Muppet Show and Day-O made sure that I knew of Belafonte as a child. A teenaged Altman devotion and Kansas City kept him present in my adolescence. And it's wonders like Carmen Jones that bleed into my adulthood.
When I read Pictures at a Revolution, I really learned how huge he was in the '60s - but you look at these stills and know he should have been bigger.

October 30, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterMike in Canada

joel6: I'm in the same boat as far as the Carmen Jones film goes. Dandridge is amazing, but Belafonte is just "good" and there is no way white Hollywood was going to get shaken out of their ways by someone who wasn't capital A amazing.
Teo: Um, Poitier had a pretty amazing stretch of over a decade of career from 1958-1972. (A lot of white actors have similar career arcs that kinda fizzle out after 10-15 years of fertile work. See also: John Cusack (Stand By Me-Grosse Pointe Blank) and Nicolas Cage (Leaving Las Vegas-Lord of War), among others.) Yes, those other examples got some clear and painful shafting from the racist system of the time, but saying that about Poitier is a big stretch.

October 30, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

Volvagia: True. I thought about it when I wrote his name, but I think the briefness of his period of stardom is significant, especially considering his talent and his status as an icon. Hard to imagine similar career trajectories for Newman, Brando, Connery, or any of the other truly iconic actors of that moment. Can't recall Robert Mitchum ever doing Thunder Road 2 the way Poitier did TV sequels to To Sir With Love.

Cage and Cusack are not comparable stars. They were popular actors who experienced real artistic peaks, but they weren't icons. (And even if you disagree and think they were, they do continue to work with top of the line filmmakers. Cage gave maybe his best performance ever in 2011 with Werner Herzog, and Cusack just came off of Maps To The Stars, which whatever its quality, is still a very high profile project.)

October 30, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterTB

Oh TB is me lol hi, I'm Teo.

Thanks for the kind words on this! Excited to write more for The Film Experience, my longtime favorite film site.

October 30, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterTB

I still enjoy listening to the Kansas City soundtrack. And Belafonte was excellent in it even if he film is sort of an odd duck.

I'm really liking this series as well. Thanks.

October 30, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterHenry

Joel 6,

As usual we are in agreement. Both Belafonte and Dandridge were dubbed. It was the 50's, not that unusual and we are talking at least a pseudo opera so it doesn't bother me as much. For those out there who wish to view it …….get a good edition, there are versions not well restored where the dubbing is off .
And maybe because of the dubbing, Pearl Bailey’s performance of Rhythm of the Drum is the highlight of the entire movie for me. She is rarely on film and she nails it here . I will even recommend to everyone the Youtube version. (And the young woman in the red dress at the end of the scene is a very young Diahann Carroll. )

October 31, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterLeslie19
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.