Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team.

This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms. 

Powered by Squarespace
DON'T MISS THIS

Follow TFE on Substackd 

COMMENTS
Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Interview: Director Roar Uthaug on Making the Disaster Film Feel Fresh in 'The Wave' | Main | Natalie Portman as Jackie »
Wednesday
Dec162015

Cinematography Outsiders

The creative leaps forward we've been seeing in the past decade have been staggering with our prominent cinematographers constantly developing new ways to experiment with visual storytelling and reinventing old tricks. Each year we also get exciting new voices added to the fray, but the Academy's cinematography branch has been reticent to include such future legends as Bradford Young and Greg Fraser.

This year is no different, with the heavyweight directors of photography set to dominate the category once again. Previous winners and perenial nominees Emmanuel Lubezki (The Revenant), Robert Richardson (the 70MM UltraPanivision The Hateful Eight), Janusz Kaminski (Bridge of Spies), Edward Lachman (Carol), and John Seale (Mad Max: Fury Road) are all in the mix with the still Oscar-less Roger Deakins (pictured above, Sicario) is always a threat.

But why so exclusive? This isn't a category that always hugs close to the Best Picture lineup, and while they've rewarded creative risks, it is typically for a seasoned vet rather than a fresh voice. None of this is meant to diss these veteran artists - they're the elite for a reason. However, here are some non-frontrunner candidates worthy of more discussion:

Creed (Maryse Alberti) - While the ballyhooed single take shot is a perfect example of the furious energy Alberti visually brings to key story moments, it's the more subtextual moments that shine - like the shot above or Adonis shadowboxing to stock footage of his father. Her work here is like a less taxing companion to what she did with The Wrestler, but just as potent. With female cinematographers unrecognized by the branch, I dare you to see her work and claim that the lack of female nominees is because there are no worthy candidates.

The Duke of Burgundy (Nic Knowland) - The film registers as such an enticing visual and aural experience that it's difficult not to get caught in its spell, even as the procedings become tedious. Knowland's work is alluring, giving a lush gaze that both provides character insight and titilates with precision. Divine, and oh so subtly sinister.

Ex Machina (Rob Hardy) - Infusing an unexpected color palette into his stately, often unmoving camera keeps this from being a remote visual exercise. Hardy also achieves the delicate balance of genre elements, sexual suggestion, and the undercurrent of WTFness present in the film's other elements.

It Follows (Mike Gioulakis) - Working in tandem with a nerve-wrattling score, Gioulakis's luridly Giallo palette turns the bland Detroit suburban landscape to menacing at every dark corner. Those key revolving camera shots may not be revolutionary, but damn are they effective and chilling.

Kumiko the Treasure Hunter (Sean Porter) - Porter's canvas is as ambiguous as the film itself: is it triumphantly hopeful or warningly bleak? As starkly remote as it is acutely detailed, his patient and deliberate camerawork turns up the tension with even the slightest pan or zoom.

Magic Mike XXL ("Peter Andrews") - Visual wit is a skill, too! "Andrews" is equally fascinated by the experience of the performer, dance recipient, and the crowd watching, creating a visual variety beyond close up flesh-oggling that allows the audience to experience the giddy fun from all perspectives.

Room (Danny Cohen) - The most likely in this lineup to receive awards recognition (Cohen is a former Oscar nominee, after all). The first act is presented with incredible spatial economy - also thanks to inventive production design from Ethan Tobman - where the extreme confinement is felt but doesn't confine the storytelling. Alternately, post-escape sequences never provide the audience this clarity of Jack and Ma's environment. Bonus points: Cohen's distanced camera placement in the haircut scene, respecting a crucial private moment.

Tangerine (Sean Baker & Radium Cheung) - Famously shot with iPhones, which lend a ferocious mobility to Sin-Dee's angry hunt on the dynamic LA streets. The budget may have been tiny, but that low-fi dexterity allows for a huge canvas of of underbelly to revolve around its charismatic leads. Baker & Cheung also know how to capture a real moment, like in the final shot as waves of compassion and forgiveness roll over Sin-Dee and Alexandra before our eyes.

Tom at the Farm (Andre Turpin) - Claustrophia invades every frame, from the eerie expanse of fields to the manic, confrontational close-ups. Turpin creates an aesthetic that goes a long way to sell why Tom might be compelled to stay in this psychological hellhole, better than the script itself.

Victoria (Sturla Brandth Grovlen) - I may be cold on the film, but the extended shot trend has never been used to this exhaustive result. Grovlen's achievement isn't just the single take, but that there is remarkable variety within the entire duration - weaving, drunken close-ups one minute, effectively establishing the space of one of the many locales the next. And that piano solo!

With so much innovation happening right now, it'd be lovely to see an outsider make its way into this often closed race. The talent pool is both wide and deep, and this list is just a toe in the water of what the branch should consider for their ballots beyond the recognizable names. FYC!!

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (11)

"Our likeliest first-time nominee Edward Lachman for Carol is an example of how hard it can be to break through while delivering brilliant work."

He was nominated for Far from Heaven, so he wouldn't be a first-time nominee this year. But he absolutely should have more than just that nomination to his credit.

There won't be a first-time nominee in this category this year, I don't think. And it's possible that 4 of the 5 nominees are previous winners (unless both Deakins and Lachman are nominated).

December 16, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterEdwin

I hope snobby DPs can see past the "iPhone novelty" of 'Tangerine' and nominate it, it had some of the most dazzling camera work in all films this year.

Maryse Alberti is just a genius. Love that she is proving women shoot sports films in unique ways. The idea of her shooting 'Million Dollar Baby' made me salivate.

However, as much as I disliked 'The Revenant', I will not be unhappy if Lubezki wins again, he's just outdoing himself with each film, and this one is even more impressive than the FX-ladden 'Gravity' and the gimmicky 'Birdman', it's Lubezki at his Malick-inspired finest.

December 16, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterJose

When We Were Kings, Crumb, Happiness, Velvet Goldmine, Joe Gould's Secret, Twilight: Los Angeles, Taxi to the Dark Side, The Wrestler, Creed...I'd say Alberti is (over)due for her first nomination.

December 17, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterPaul Outlaw

Edwin - I also went straight to IMDB to check! God, Far from Heaven was so mistreated by the Academy.

A great read. I'm a big fan of "Peter Andrews". The things he's doing with the light and the composition in The Knick deserve to be shown in a museum.

December 17, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterPeggy Sue

Edwin - fixed, you're a hero. Why did I remember him as being left out??? (probably because FFH missed other noms it deserved)

December 17, 2015 | Registered CommenterChris Feil

A favorite of mine that you left out- Son of Saul, where the movement of the camera and the choice of what is and what is not shown add to the chaos and horror of the events in the film.

December 17, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterEvan

Evan - I'm sure it'd be there otherwise but I haven't seen it yet :'-(

December 17, 2015 | Registered CommenterChris Feil

what a great list Chris. I want to rematch a couple of these right now. I continue to be weirded out that awards bodies are ignoring CREED. i thought it was going to be a slam dunk after seeing it.

there's probably not going to be room for a newbie this year given that so many giants are working but i wish Oscar could look past Robert Richardson once in awhile. I'm still scratching my head over his Django Unchained nomination and he already has 3 Oscars.

December 17, 2015 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

Richardson's best work with Tarantino continues to be Kill Bill. Unable to articulate why the rest of their collaborations do nothing for me as eye candy.

December 17, 2015 | Unregistered Commenter/3rtful

Tangerine's cinematography isn't just "good for a movie shot on iPhones" it's gorgeous by any standards, even compared to superproductions with enormous budgets. Where is the critical support when you need it?

December 17, 2015 | Unregistered Commenterken s

Maryse Alberti totally deserved awards nominations for The Wrestler. Looking forward to seeing Creed. (Much as I detested Fruitvale Express..)

Though I wanted more from it, I definitely don't agree that Duke of Burgundy becomes dull at any point.

Also the Room cinematography was truly inspired... until the mid-film transition where it suddenly becomes film-school-level blah and, I would argue, doesn't fully recover for the rest of the film.

On the other hand I totally support the FYC for Tangerine. There was a crazy amount of genius in that film and the photography was one of its strongest, most original, and most I-can't-believe-this-is-even-working-much-less-blowing-my-mind elements.

December 17, 2015 | Unregistered Commentergoran
Member Account Required
You must have a member account to comment. It's free so register here.. IF YOU ARE ALREADY REGISTERED, JUST LOGIN.