Oscar History
Film Bitch History
Welcome

The Film Experience™ was created by Nathaniel R. All material herein is written by our team. (This site is not for profit but for an expression of love for cinema & adjacent artforms.)

Follow TFE on Substackd

Powered by Squarespace
DON'T MISS THIS

THE OSCAR VOLLEYS ~ ongoing! 

ACTRESS
ACTOR
SUPP' ACTRESS
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for 500... no 390 SubscribersIf you read us daily, please be one.  

I ♥ The Film Experience

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
« Linking Out | Main | London Film Fest: "360" and "Shame" »
Sunday
Oct162011

NYFF: "The Artist" Is A Work of Art

The orchestra swells immediately. The retro credits practically shout the glory of the talent "MICHEL HAZANAVICIUS!", JEAN DUJARDIN!" "BERENICE BEJO!" (exclamation points ours -ed.) but the first telling words on the screen in The Artist are actually wittily posted on a sign, urging everyone to keep their mouths shut. 

Please Be Silent Behind The Screen."

George Valentin shows off at his big premiere

We are at the premiere of A Russian Affair, the latest from silent film star George Valentin (Cannes Best Actor winner Jean Dujardin) as he paces behind the screen waiting for the film to end. You can feel the tension as he waits for the audience reaction. The score drops out completely and we hear... nothing (Tension!). Then comes the audience's thunderous applause (Relief!) ... but we still hear nothing. This punchline in the absence of sound gives The Artist its first huge and knowing release of laughter. We can't hear the applause but we sure can see it in the joyous smile spreading across the star's face. That smile is already mirrored and multiplied by anyone watching this new gem.

George meets PeppyThe push and pull between what we expect to hear or see, and what comes instead is one of the great and consistent punchline joys of this silent film about silent films. Again and again the writer/director and his excellent cast (led with infectious verve by the Oscar-worthy Dujardin) will surprise and move us. Sometimes the magic comes through an unexpected camera movement or destination and sometimes through the physicality of the actors themselves and often by both at once. The laughs even come through sound -- though never in conventional ways; The Artist is, from start to finish, an exuberantly inventive homage to the movies such as they were and such as they are.

The story is both charmingly dated, and blissfully universal, which is to say contemporary; technology and tastes will always evolve and change and disrupt the status quo. George Valentin has the world at his (happy) feet in 1927 when the movie begins but by the time the 1929 title card arrives, he's already a dinosaur. He just didn't feel the asteroid's impact and hasn't yet felt the chill. Valentin laughs off his co-star's (Missi Pyle doing an intentional riff on Lina Lamont) sound test even though his director (John Goodman) warns him...

That's the future."

The future arrives, as it always does, through doors opened by the past. In 1927 Valentin gives a leg up to a complete nobody Peppy Miller (Bérénice Bejo madly winking and, well, peppy, filmed at 20 frames a second) by giving her a big fannish paparazzi moment. She makes the most of this flashbulb spotlight and lands a part in his next film A German Affair . In one of the film's funniest sequences, which sneakily lays dramatic foundation for the second act, we see them do several takes of an inconsequential dancing scene together. I won't spoil the many joys of the unfolding plot but let it suffice to say that it fondly recalls all rise and fall and pick yourself back up showbiz narratives particularly A Star is Born as Peppy's star rises (she's the new "it girl" in talkies) just as Valentin's falls. 

The future is coming

Though the film organically veers towards the sentimental in its second half, it has built such comic goodwill and affection that you don't mind laughing less as George's decline takes the film toward its heaviest dramatic moments. The Artist even risks the maudlin as Valentin keeps uncovering new rock bottoms but there's a beautiful simplicity in its heartbreak imagery. In one scene the once great star stands in front of a projector in his lonely home berating himself for being "stupid and proud"; he's now just a shadow on a smallish screen. Hazanivicious, to his credit, never stops blissfully and obviously cribbing from the best of Old Hollywood like Orson Welles, A Star is Born, Sunset Blvd., and Asta. Regarding the latter, The Artist's not so secret weapon iis its star dog "Uggy" -- a constant companion to Valentin -- who could be a direct descendant from that famous screwball comedy terrier. Best of all, Hazanavicius never settles for just one mood, usually gifting the images and scenes with multiple feelings. To cite but one example, there's a shot that highlights Valentin's disintegrating marraige to Doris (Penelope Anne Miller) which shows you three Valentin's: on the wall hangs a deified Valentin in oil portraiture, standing in front of him is Valentin the actual man realizing his wife is leaving him while holding a defaced photo of his movie star self in his hands (his wife has been scribbling on his headshot). Isn't that the archetypal private life of a celebrity actor in a nutshell?

The Artist in concept could have been a mere spoof, or a pleasant but insubstantial comic homage but Hazanavicius and his gifted team never settle, always reaching for bigger laughs, and delivering unexpected and immensely clever mise en scène. The actors are magicians, themselves. Despite the constant literal winking, as befits the era, they never figuratively wink at the material, which would take you outside of it. It's a movie of sincere and not ironic pleasure.

A retroactive time-travelling note to all selection committees of "future" film festivals in 2011: Always schedule The Artist as your Closing Night movie. It's an impossible act to follow and it'll send your audiences off with hearts soaring. They're return with pleasure the following year eager to see what you've programmed for them. When the movie opens in theaters they'll be returning, too. A

Jean DuJardin and "Uggy", a match made in heaven.

Re: the Oscars
The Artist is the best kind of Oscar contender in that it never once feels like it was built to hook the Academy, but it will surely prove irresistibly delicious bait nonetheless. Expect nominations across the board for what will surely be one of our Best Picture contenders. It's the only film this season aside from Martin Scorsese's Hugo that's so deeply infatuated with the history of the movies themselves, the very thing that the Academy was built to chronicle.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (15)

Personally, I think The Artist has great chances of becoming the "It movie" of the season and a Best Picture frontrunner.
Also speaking of Oscars, a three-time Oscar nominated legendary actress Angela Lansbury turned 86 today! Happy Birthday to a great actress and a wonderful lady!

October 16, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterwill

What a great review! I can't wait to see this one.

October 16, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterdinasztie

Nathaniel, isn't this your first flat A since Brokeback Mountain? It feels like all the others have been A/A- at best, usually falling to the A- (like The Social Network and Drive).

October 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterKevin

Kevin -- i dunno. i try not to think about it. at some point i got wary of handing out As and it stopped happening... which is my problem and not specifically the movies. But i gave two As this year again (A SEPARATION and THE ARTIST) both of which i just felt so grateful to be watching for multiple reasons. i know that sometimes i say A/A- when i really mean "A-" and sometimes I say "A/A=" when I really mean "A" but am letter- shy?!

but anyway. I am totally in love with it. i know many people think the second half isn't as strong (kind of like the WALL•E thing actually... as it is kind of bifurcated) but honestly i didn't need it to be uproariously funny for the entire running time.

October 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterNathanielR

Have I missed something, or has no big Oscar-analyst on the web predicted DuJardin to win? That seems like an obvious prediction to me. Hell, if they'll give it to Benigni....

October 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterThe Jack

I think jardin will win.

October 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMrripley

A! Yay!

(Great write-up, Nathaniel. Your analysis of some of the shots made me appreciate the film even more!)

October 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterEvan

Thank you for the review!
I did't like it as much as you did but I liked it just fine. Witty, inventive and moving.
Maybe some times I felt it was being all style and nothing else and that's why I didn't love it.

October 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterJames T

Nathaniel - I'm right on the same page with you on this. Loved that the film was willing to risk departing from a strictly comedic POV in the second and third act. The tilt toward classic Hollywood melodrama gave the second half a charge all its own and was as expertly handled as the first act comedy. And I swear - the final sequence of the film is about the most happy making five or so minutes of anything I've seen in I can't even tell you how long. I don't really want to give it away in any way shape or form, but that the whole... thing... was done in wide shot (and with only a couple cuts, I think) just made my day.

October 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRoark

I hope The Artist wins the Best Picture Oscar even if it will make Harvey Weinstein even more obnoxious. The Artist was made with so much love for the medium, it deserves all the praise it is getting. Both lead actors are wonderful -- and that dog.

But will someone explain the use of Bernard Herrmann's music near the end of the film?

October 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterGabriel Oak

Thank you for the review Nat, now I am really dying to see this. (Visually, I thought it interesting that what I saw of the trailer indicates a style closer to late '30's - '40's film than the 1920's. I'm interested to see how they make it all come together for myself.) And, black and white on the big screen? Yes, please. (The question is - will they have it at a single cinema in Connecticut that I can actually get to? I'm not holding my breath on that one.) This already feels like a movie that I need to see in the theater.

October 17, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterJanice

I'm not as infatuated with it as others although it was undoubtedly a joy to watch, and I do think it will end up taking Best Picture. Didn't it just win the audience award at the Hamptons festival where a bunch of East Coast AMPAS voters are who gave it to The King's Speech last year? It just seems to fit the trope so well of the fresh and perhaps edgy-seeming film that really tugs at the most traditional of emotions that the Academy's always gone for, like Slumdog Millionaire.

October 17, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterJack

Janice - Hazanavicius said in the Q&A after my screening that his touchstones from the silent era were The Crowd, Sunrise, and some Frank Borzage films (oh, and Fritz Lang's Spies for one sequence in particular) - and those directors/films all anticipate/lay the groundwork for the classic sound era aesthetic you picked up on. Though there's also no doubt that he's working within that 30s/40s stylistic template as well. i thought the work rather seamless, myself, while also being aware of his reference points throughout. The film threads the needle nicely in that regard.

October 17, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRoark

I absolutely loved everything about The Artist! I gave it an A+ when I saw it at TIFF. If there is an actor I want to win the Best Actor Oscar over my bebe Michael Fassbender,.. it is Jean, he deserves it straight up. Hell, even Uggy should win Best Supporting Actor! I can't wait to see it again, and The Artist will be in my DVD collection.

October 17, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterSimone

But perhaps most importantly, "The Artist" is just flat out entertaining. In this era when technology and brands seem to precede ideas and talent, Hazanavicius' film is a reminder that a good story, with great acting that delivers what it promises will always go further than gimmicks and temporary pop culture phenomenons. I will buy this movie and buy essay about it!

November 28, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterLesha Conner
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.